Erollisi Marr - The Nameless

Go Back   Erollisi Marr - The Nameless > NON EQ Stuff (Real life, other games, etc.) > Steam Vent


Reply
 
Add/Share Add/Share Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-15-2004, 09:19 PM   #1
Zolspaz
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 619
Default I know how much you fine folks love Ann Coulter

Brothers Band Together Against Kerry
August 11, 2004

Democrats haven't been this upset about an American engaging in free speech since Juanita Broaddrick
opened her yap.

Two hundred fifty-four Swift Boat Veterans have signed a letter saying John Kerry is not fit to be
commander in chief, a point developed in some detail in the blockbuster new book by John O'Neill, aptly
titled "Unfit for Command." At the 2003 reunion of Swift Boat Veterans, about 300 men showed up: 85
percent of them think Kerry is unfit to be president. (On the bright side, Kerry was voted, in absentia,
"Most Likely to Run for President on His Phony War Record.") Fewer than 10 percent of all Swift Boat
Veterans contacted refused to sign the letter.

Kerry was in Vietnam for only four months, which, coincidentally, is less than the combined airtime he's
spent talking about it. It takes a special kind of person to get that many people to hate your guts in so little
time. The last time this many people hated one person after only four months was when Margaret Cho had
her own sitcom.

But our young Eddie Haskell managed to annoy other servicemen even before he came home and called
them war criminals. About 60 eyewitnesses to Kerry's service are cited in the book, describing Kerry
fleeing comrades who were under attack, disregarding orders, putting others in danger, sucking up to his
commanders, creating phony film footage of his exploits with a home-movie camera, and recommending
himself for medals and Purple Hearts in vainglorious reports he wrote himself. (This was apparently before
the concept of "fragging" put limits on such behavior.)

After three months of combat, Kerry had collected enough film footage for his political campaigns, so he
went home. He even shot three different endings to the episode where he chases down a VC guy after
test audiences thought Kerry shooting a wounded teenager in the back was too much of a "downer." After
filming his last staged exploit, Kerry reportedly told a buddy, "That's a wrap. See you at the convention in
about 35 years."

Kerry is demanding to be made president on the basis of spending four months in Vietnam 35 years ago.
And yet the men who know what he did during those four months don't think he's fit to be dogcatcher. That
seems newsworthy to me, but I must be wrong since the media have engineered a total blackout of the
Swift Boat Veterans.

In May, the Swiftees held a spellbinding press conference in Washington, D.C. In front of a photo being
used by the Kerry campaign to tout Kerry's war service, the officers stood up, one by one, pointed to their
own faces in the campaign photo, and announced that they believed Kerry unfit for command. Only one
officer in the photo supports Kerry for president. Seventeen say he is not fit to be president.


The press covered it much as they covered Paula Jones' first press conference.

With the media playing their usual role as Truth Commissar for the now-dead Soviet Union, the Swiftees
are having to purchase ad time in order to be heard. No Tim Russert interviews, no "Today" show
appearances, no New York Times editorials or Vanity Fair hagiographies for these heretics against the
liberal religion. The only way Swift Boat Veterans for Truth could get less attention would be to go on "Air
America" radio.

If the 254 veterans against Kerry got one-tenth as much media coverage for calling Kerry a liar as Clown
Joe Wilson did for calling Bush a liar, the veterans wouldn't need to buy ad time to get their message out.
(Wilson, you'll recall, was a media darling for six or seven months before being exposed as a fantasist by
Senate investigators.)

With their commitment to free speech and a robust exchange of ideas (i.e., "child pornography" and
"sedition"), the Democratic National Committee is threatening to sue TV stations that run the Swift Boat
Veterans' paid ads. Sue? Can you tell already that there are two lawyers at the top of the Democratic
ticket? These are the same people who accuse John Ashcroft of shredding the Bill of Rights. WHY ISN'T
THE PRESS COVERING THIS??? Wait, now I remember. OK, never mind. (Contribute to the Swift Boat
Veterans here.)

The threat to sue is absurd, but will allow the very same TV stations that are already censoring the Swiftees
to have an excuse to censor even purchased airtime.

Leave aside the fact that Kerry is a presidential candidate and judging by the ads being run against
George Bush I gather there's nothing you can't say about a presidential candidate, including calling him
Hitler. After reading "Unfit for Command," I am pretty sure Kerry doesn't want a neutral tribunal deciding
who's telling the truth here.

The Swift Boat Veterans provide detailed accounts from dozens and dozens of eyewitnesses to Kerry's
Uriah Heep-like behavior which "Unfit for Command" contrasts with Kerry's boastful descriptions of the
exact same incidents.

By contrast, Kerry's supporters have their usual off-the-rack denunciations of any witness against a
Democrat. The veterans are: liars, bigots, idiots, politically motivated, and I was never alone in a hotel with
Paula Jones.

Ron Brownstein, Los Angeles Times reporter and Bill Clinton's favorite reporter, compared the Swift Boat
Veterans' ad to a "snuff film." He claimed the veterans have "strong Republican ties."

Apparently, before being permitted to engage in free speech against Democrats in this country you have
to: (1) prove that you are not a Republican, (2) take a vow of poverty, and (3) purchase the right to speak in
a TV ad. On the basis of Clown Wilson, Michael Moore, George Soros, Moveon.org, etc., etc., etc., I
gather the requirements for engaging in free speech against a Republican are somewhat less rigorous.
Hey! Maybe John Edwards is right: There really are two Americas!

O'Neill, the author of "Unfit for Command" and founder of Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, can be heard on
the Nixon tapes unaware that he was being taped telling Nixon that he came from a family of Democrats
and voted for Hubert Humphrey in the prior election. Unlike Joe Wilson, Anita Hill or Richard Clarke,
Woodward and Bernstein, et al., O'Neill has said he will take no royalties on his book but will donate all his
profits to the Navy. So I think even under liberals' rules, O'Neill is allowed to have an opinion.

Before the book was released and O'Neill could appear to defend it, liberals were on television
denouncing the book. If memory serves, the last book Democrats tried this hard to suppress was the Bible.
The DNC is threatening to sue to prevent the Swift Boat Veterans from buying ad time. When Democrats
are this terrified of a book, it's not because they have a good answer. Howard Dean can accuse Ashcroft
of book-burning all he wants, but it's the Democrats who are doing everything in their power to prevent
you from reading "Unfit for Command." In bookstores beginning this week

Ann Coulter , you're simply
BREATHLESS.



God Bless America
Zolspaz.
Zolspaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2004, 09:27 PM   #2
Lurikeen
Freaky
 
Lurikeen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 17,873
She used to look good, but I think she needs a bit more plastic surgery to make her look young again. Otherwise she could be the old woman in the bathroom scene with Jach Nickolson in the "Shining".
__________________
"All I said was... that bit of halibut is good enough for Jehovah." Monty Python's "Life of Brian"
Lurikeen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2004, 09:32 PM   #3
Azraelwrath
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 3,102
How do you like dem apples?
__________________
SOE Applicant: Here is my resume.
SOE Interviewer: It's half finished.
SOE Applicant: So are your products.
SOE Interviewer: You're hired.
Azraelwrath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 08:29 AM   #4
Hormadrune
Sociopathic bully?
 
Hormadrune's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: PA
Posts: 11,895
I'd bang her in the ass if I could ball-gag her first, otherwise I wouldn't touch that worthless cum dumpster.
__________________
WoW-Ghostlands-US: Prae | sp | Prolonix | Horm | Ulfhednar | l
EQ: Hormadrune <Retired> <OFS> <CoI> <Affy> <CE>
Hormadrune is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:03 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.